[PATCH] D52450: [Intrinsic] Add llvm.minnan and llvm.maxnan instrinsic functions

[Thomas Lively via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

tlively added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52450#1248590, @sunfish wrote:

> It's ok for WebAssembly's semantics to be more constrained than LLVM's. It's the reverse that would be a problem.


That's true, except that if the semantics of the LLVM intrinsics were not as strict as the semantics of the WebAssembly instructions, then there would be no way for programmers to access WebAssembly's exact semantics at the source level, which is the whole point of implementing these intrinsics at all.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D52450