[PATCH] D50969: [Sparc] Improve the builtin setjmp/longjmp

Daniel Cederman via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 27 06:36:36 PDT 2018

Previous message: [PATCH] D51237: DAG: Check transformed type for forming fminnum/fmaxnum from vselect
Next message: [PATCH] D50969: [Sparc] Improve the builtin setjmp/longjmp
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

dcederman added a comment.

I'm fixing them for the failures and to learn about LLVM. I have no use case and I'm perfectly fine with and in favor of removing the support. Can I just revert the patch that introduced the support, or should I submit a removal patch for review?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D50969

Previous message: [PATCH] D51237: DAG: Check transformed type for forming fminnum/fmaxnum from vselect
Next message: [PATCH] D50969: [Sparc] Improve the builtin setjmp/longjmp
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list