[PATCH] D50310: Improve the legalisation lowering of UMULO

[Simonas Kazlauskas via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

nagisa added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50310#1190302, @efriedma wrote:

> No tests for umul.with.overflow.i64 on 32-bit?


Thanks for the review. On one hand, I ended up forgetting as it was getting late, on the other hand, those are already tested by the definition of the i128 umulo lowering which uses i64 umulo in its implementation. I will add a few tests targetting i64 umulo specifically later today.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D50310