[llvm] r336864 - [LoopIdiomRecognize] Don't convert a do while loop to ctlz.

Craig Topper via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 11 15:35:28 PDT 2018


Author: ctopper
Date: Wed Jul 11 15:35:28 2018
New Revision: 336864

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=336864&view=rev
Log:
[LoopIdiomRecognize] Don't convert a do while loop to ctlz.

This commit suppresses turning loops like this into "(bitwidth - ctlz(input))".

unsigned foo(unsigned input) {
  unsigned num = 0;
  do {
    ++num;
    input >>= 1;
  } while (input != 0);
  return num;
}

The loop version returns a value of 1 for both an input of 0 and an input of 1. Converting to a naive ctlz does not preserve that.

Theoretically we could do better if we checked isKnownNonZero or we could insert a select to handle the divergence. But until we have motivating cases for that, this is the easiest solution.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/X86/ctlz.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp?rev=336864&r1=336863&r2=336864&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp Wed Jul 11 15:35:28 2018
@@ -1405,16 +1405,21 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::recognizeAndIns
   if (DefX->getOpcode() == Instruction::AShr && !isKnownNonNegative(InitX, *DL))
     return false;
 
-  // If we check X != 0 before entering the loop we don't need a zero
-  // check in CTLZ intrinsic, but only if Cnt Phi is not used outside of the
-  // loop (if it is used we count CTLZ(X >> 1)).
-  if (!IsCntPhiUsedOutsideLoop)
-    if (BasicBlock *PreCondBB = PH->getSinglePredecessor())
-      if (BranchInst *PreCondBr =
-          dyn_cast<BranchInst>(PreCondBB->getTerminator())) {
-        if (matchCondition(PreCondBr, PH) == InitX)
-          ZeroCheck = true;
-      }
+  // If we are using the count instruction outside the loop, make sure we
+  // have a zero check as a precondition. Without the check the loop would run
+  // one iteration for before any check of the input value. This means 0 and 1
+  // would have identical behavior in the original loop and thus
+  if (!IsCntPhiUsedOutsideLoop) {
+    auto *PreCondBB = PH->getSinglePredecessor();
+    if (!PreCondBB)
+      return false;
+    auto *PreCondBI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(PreCondBB->getTerminator());
+    if (!PreCondBI)
+      return false;
+    if (matchCondition(PreCondBI, PH) != InitX)
+      return false;
+    ZeroCheck = true;
+  }
 
   // Check if CTLZ intrinsic is profitable. Assume it is always profitable
   // if we delete the loop (the loop has only 6 instructions):

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/X86/ctlz.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/X86/ctlz.ll?rev=336864&r1=336863&r2=336864&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/X86/ctlz.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/X86/ctlz.ll Wed Jul 11 15:35:28 2018
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ while.end:
   ret i32 %cnt.0.lcssa
 }
 
-; FIXME: We should not transform this loop. It returns 1 for an input of both
+; We can't easily transform this loop. It returns 1 for an input of both
 ; 0 and 1.
 ;
 ; int ctlz_bad(unsigned n)
@@ -496,15 +496,22 @@ while.end:
 ;   return i;
 ; }
 ;
-; ALL:  entry
-; ALL-NEXT:  %0 = call i32 @llvm.ctlz.i32(i32 %n, i1 false)
-; ALL-NEXT:  %1 = sub i32 32, %0
-; ALL-NEXT:  br label %while.cond
-; ALL:  %inc.lcssa = phi i32 [ %1, %while.cond ]
-; ALL:  ret i32 %inc.lcssa
-
 ; Function Attrs: norecurse nounwind readnone uwtable
 define i32 @ctlz_bad(i32 %n) {
+; ALL-LABEL: @ctlz_bad(
+; ALL-NEXT:  entry:
+; ALL-NEXT:    br label [[WHILE_COND:%.*]]
+; ALL:       while.cond:
+; ALL-NEXT:    [[N_ADDR_0:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[N:%.*]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[SHR:%.*]], [[WHILE_COND]] ]
+; ALL-NEXT:    [[I_0:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY]] ], [ [[INC:%.*]], [[WHILE_COND]] ]
+; ALL-NEXT:    [[SHR]] = lshr i32 [[N_ADDR_0]], 1
+; ALL-NEXT:    [[TOBOOL:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[SHR]], 0
+; ALL-NEXT:    [[INC]] = add nsw i32 [[I_0]], 1
+; ALL-NEXT:    br i1 [[TOBOOL]], label [[WHILE_END:%.*]], label [[WHILE_COND]]
+; ALL:       while.end:
+; ALL-NEXT:    [[INC_LCSSA:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[INC]], [[WHILE_COND]] ]
+; ALL-NEXT:    ret i32 [[INC_LCSSA]]
+;
 entry:
   br label %while.cond
 




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list