[PATCH] D48349: [ADT] Add llvm::unique_function which is like std::function but supporting move-only closures.

[Chandler Carruth via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

chandlerc added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D48349#1138090, @zturner wrote:

> In that case maybe `FunctionExtras.h` in keeping with the llvm naming
> spirit


I'm fine with the idea of this, but I'm always frustrated by the generic "extras" name component. Feels about as useless at "Utils". But I lack a significantly better idea....

Closest thing to a better idea I have is `FunctionTypeErasure.h` or `CallableTypeErasuer.h`. Thoughts? Other folks with naming thoughts here?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D48349