[PATCH] D48225: [llvm-mca][X86] Teach how to identify register writes that implicitly clear the upper portion of a super-register.

[Matt Davis via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mattd added a comment.

I'm cool with the patch.   I don't see anything wrong.



================
Comment at: lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86MCTargetDesc.cpp:330
+
+  auto ClearsSuperReg = [=](unsigned RegID) {
+    // On X86-64, a general purpose integer register is viewed as a 64-bit
----------------
I like this lambda, and it makes sense to me.  AFAIK, the [=] capture encourages a copy of GR32RC and VR256XRC.  Can we get away with a reference capture [&] instead?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D48225