[PATCH] D47838: [lldb-mi] Re-implement MI -exec-step command.

[Greg Clayton via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

clayborg added inline comments.


================
Comment at: lldb/trunk/tools/lldb-mi/MICmdCmdExec.cpp:505-509
+  if (error.Success())
+    return MIstatus::success;
+
+  SetError(error.GetCString());
+  return MIstatus::failure;
----------------
Utility funciton for these last four line? I mentioned it in another review:
```
MIstatus ReturnMIStatus(lldb::SBError &error) {
  if (error.Success())
    return MIstatus::success;

  SetError(error.GetCString());
  return MIstatus::failure;
}
```


================
Comment at: lldb/trunk/tools/lldb-mi/MICmdCmdExec.cpp:524
 bool CMICmdCmdExecStep::Acknowledge() {
-  if (m_lldbResult.GetErrorSize() > 0) {
-    const char *pLldbErr = m_lldbResult.GetError();
-    MIunused(pLldbErr);
-    const CMICmnMIValueConst miValueConst(m_lldbResult.GetError());
-    const CMICmnMIValueResult miValueResult("message", miValueConst);
-    const CMICmnMIResultRecord miRecordResult(
-        m_cmdData.strMiCmdToken, CMICmnMIResultRecord::eResultClass_Error,
-        miValueResult);
-    m_miResultRecord = miRecordResult;
-  } else {
-    const CMICmnMIResultRecord miRecordResult(
-        m_cmdData.strMiCmdToken, CMICmnMIResultRecord::eResultClass_Running);
-    m_miResultRecord = miRecordResult;
-  }
-
+  m_miResultRecord = CMICmnMIResultRecord(
+      m_cmdData.strMiCmdToken, CMICmnMIResultRecord::eResultClass_Running);
----------------
How does this code handle the error case for stepping now?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D47838