[PATCH] D47380: Make getStrictFPOpcodeAction(...) more accessible

[Ulrich Weigand via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

uweigand added a comment.

Is there a reason for dropping the "FP" from "StrictFP" in the method name?   I think it would be better to keep it (i.e. use "getStrictFPOperationAction"), in particular since there are already other public methods in this area that use "StrictFP", like isStrictFPOpcode and MutateStrictFPToFP.

Otherwise this LGTM.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D47380