[PATCH] D47271: [libFuzzer] Don't complain about lack of interesting inputs when -runs=0.
Max Moroz via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 23 11:14:06 PDT 2018
Dor1s updated this revision to Diff 148254.
Dor1s added a comment.
Stop being stupid and write conditions right (i.e. remove "!")
Repository:
rCRT Compiler Runtime
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47271
Files:
lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp
test/fuzzer/not-instrumented.test
Index: test/fuzzer/not-instrumented.test
===================================================================
--- test/fuzzer/not-instrumented.test
+++ test/fuzzer/not-instrumented.test
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
RUN: %cpp_compiler %S/NotinstrumentedTest.cpp -fsanitize-coverage=0 -o %t-NotinstrumentedTest-NoCoverage
-RUN: not %run %t-NotinstrumentedTest-NoCoverage 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO_COVERAGE
+RUN: not %run %t-NotinstrumentedTest-NoCoverage -runs=1 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO_COVERAGE
NO_COVERAGE: ERROR: no interesting inputs were found. Is the code instrumented for coverage? Exiting
Index: lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp
+++ lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@
Printf("INFO: %zd/%zd inputs touch the focus function\n",
Corpus.NumInputsThatTouchFocusFunction(), Corpus.size());
- if (Corpus.empty()) {
+ if (Corpus.empty() && Options.MaxNumberOfRuns) {
Printf("ERROR: no interesting inputs were found. "
"Is the code instrumented for coverage? Exiting.\n");
exit(1);
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D47271.148254.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1140 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20180523/b7459b09/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list