[PATCH] D47062: Suggest lldb-dotest to reproduce a failure.

[Adrian Prantl via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

aprantl added inline comments.


================
Comment at: packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/dosep.py:122
             print("[%s FAILED]%s" % (name, timeout_str), file=sys.stderr)
-            print("Command invoked: %s" % ' '.join(command), file=sys.stderr)
+            print("Reproduce with: lldb-dotest -f {}".format(name), file=sys.stderr)
         update_progress(name)
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> aprantl wrote:
> > What do you think about adding the full path to lldb-dotest? I usually have at least three concurrent checkouts of lldb at any time.
> Me too, but how would we get that information here? On of `lldb-dotest`'s goals is that you can execute it from anywhere, so you'd either have to pass it explicitly to `dotest.py` (either using a custom argument and cmake variable combo, or by assuming it lives in the same directory as the current lldb and appending `-dotest`) but that feels like it might not be worth it. Maybe there's another solution you had in mind?
The --executable option that dotest receives should point to an lldb that ought to have a matching lldb-dotest next to it. I don't think that that is particularly ugly.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D47062