[PATCH] D46966: [lld] Use a real timestamp, with the option to use hash or explicit value

[Zachary Turner via llvm-commits]

Let's see if it fails with the same stack trace the next time around.
Given that it's only on the stage 4 (all 3 previous stages ran the same
test and passed), and given that the stack trace shows something about
threads, it could be some flake that has nothing to do with my change.  If
it comes back with the same stack trace again though, then we can start
head scratching.

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:58 AM Zachary Turner via Phabricator <
reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:

> zturner added a comment.
>
> That is bizarre.  It's the /Brepro code path that's failing, and this
> codepath does exactly what it used to do, which didn't fail on any bots.
> Any ideas?
>
>
> Repository:
>   rL LLVM
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D46966
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20180517/1b599e1e/attachment-0001.html>