[PATCH] D46455: [MachineVerifier][GlobalISel] Checking that generic instrs have LLTs on all vregs
Roman Tereshin via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 4 13:45:44 PDT 2018
rtereshin created this revision.
rtereshin added reviewers: t.p.northover, bogner, qcolombet, ab.
Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, kristof.beyls, rovka.
Every generic machine instruction must have generic virtual registers
only, that is, have a low-level type attached to each operand.
Previously MachineVerifier would catch a type missing on an operand
only if the previous operand for the the same type index exists and
have a type attached to it and it will report it as a type mismatch.
This is incosistent behaviour and a misleading error message.
This commit makes sure MachineVerifier explicitly checks that the
types are there for every operand and if not provides a
straightforward error message.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46455
Files:
lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp
lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp
test/CodeGen/X86/verifier-generic-types-1.mir
test/CodeGen/X86/verifier-generic-types-2.mir
Index: test/CodeGen/X86/verifier-generic-types-2.mir
===================================================================
--- test/CodeGen/X86/verifier-generic-types-2.mir
+++ test/CodeGen/X86/verifier-generic-types-2.mir
@@ -1,9 +1,16 @@
# RUN: not llc -o - %s -mtriple=x86_64-- -verify-machineinstrs -run-pass=none 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-# CHECK: Bad machine code: type mismatch in generic instruction
+# CHECK: Bad machine code: Generic instruction is missing a virtual register type
# CHECK-NEXT: - function: first_type_of_a_type_index_missing_and_a_mismatch
# CHECK-NEXT: - basic block: %bb.0
-# CHECK-NEXT: - instruction: %2:gr64 = G_ADD %0:_, %1:_
+# CHECK-NEXT: - instruction: %2:gr64 = G_ADD %0:_(s64), %1:_
+# CHECK-NEXT: - operand 0: %2:gr64
+
+# CHECK: Bad machine code: Type mismatch in generic instruction
+# CHECK-NEXT: - function: first_type_of_a_type_index_missing_and_a_mismatch
+# CHECK-NEXT: - basic block: %bb.0
+# CHECK-NEXT: - instruction: %2:gr64 = G_ADD %0:_(s64), %1:_
+# CHECK-NEXT: - operand 2: %1:_(s32)
---
name: first_type_of_a_type_index_missing_and_a_mismatch
Index: test/CodeGen/X86/verifier-generic-types-1.mir
===================================================================
--- test/CodeGen/X86/verifier-generic-types-1.mir
+++ test/CodeGen/X86/verifier-generic-types-1.mir
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
# RUN: not llc -o - %s -mtriple=x86_64-- -verify-machineinstrs -run-pass=none 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-# XFAIL: *
# CHECK-NOT: Type mismatch
Index: lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp
+++ lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp
@@ -929,9 +929,19 @@
const MachineOperand *MO = &MI->getOperand(I);
LLT OpTy = MRI->getType(MO->getReg());
- if (Types[TypeIdx].isValid() && Types[TypeIdx] != OpTy)
- report("type mismatch in generic instruction", MI);
- Types[TypeIdx] = OpTy;
+ // Don't report a type mismatch if there is no actual mismatch, only a
+ // type missing, to reduce noise:
+ if (OpTy.isValid()) {
+ // Only the first valid type for a type index will be printed: don't
+ // overwrite it later so it's always clear which type was expected:
+ if (!Types[TypeIdx].isValid())
+ Types[TypeIdx] = OpTy;
+ else if (Types[TypeIdx] != OpTy)
+ report("Type mismatch in generic instruction", MO, I, OpTy);
+ } else {
+ // Generic instructions must have types attached to their operands.
+ report("Generic instruction is missing a virtual register type", MO, I);
+ }
}
// Generic opcodes must not have physical register operands.
Index: lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp
+++ lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp
@@ -1224,8 +1224,12 @@
if (PrintedTypes[OpInfo.getGenericTypeIndex()])
return LLT{};
- PrintedTypes.set(OpInfo.getGenericTypeIndex());
- return MRI.getType(Op.getReg());
+ LLT TypeToPrint = MRI.getType(Op.getReg());
+ // Don't mark the type index printed if it wasn't actually printed: maybe
+ // another operand with the same type index has an actual type attached:
+ if (TypeToPrint.isValid())
+ PrintedTypes.set(OpInfo.getGenericTypeIndex());
+ return TypeToPrint;
}
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D46455.145269.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3422 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20180504/762711c4/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list