[PATCH] D45874: [LoopUnroll] Split out simplify code after Unroll into a new function. NFC
Florian Hahn via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 20 08:00:29 PDT 2018
fhahn accepted this revision.
fhahn added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I think this is a reasonable code movement to make things slightly more modular. LGTM, but please wait with committing till next week, so other people have a chance to chime in.
================
Comment at: lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp:255
+static void simplifyLoopAfterUnroll(Loop *L, bool SimplifyIVs, LoopInfo *LI,
+ ScalarEvolution *SE, DominatorTree *DT,
----------------
Could you add a comment here summarizing which simplifications are done here?
================
Comment at: lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp:822
- // Simplify any new induction variables in the partially unrolled loop.
- if (SE && !CompletelyUnroll && (Count > 1 || Peeled)) {
- SmallVector<WeakTrackingVH, 16> DeadInsts;
- simplifyLoopIVs(L, SE, DT, LI, DeadInsts);
-
- // Aggressively clean up dead instructions that simplifyLoopIVs already
- // identified. Any remaining should be cleaned up below.
- while (!DeadInsts.empty())
- if (Instruction *Inst =
- dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(&*DeadInsts.pop_back_val()))
- RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Inst);
- }
-
// At this point, the code is well formed. We now do a quick sweep over the
// inserted code, doing constant propagation and dead code elimination as we
----------------
I think this comment is stale now
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45874
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list