[llvm] r327004 - [InstCombine, NewGVN] remove FP undef from tests
Daniel Berlin via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Apr 12 09:58:21 PDT 2018
So:
I believe the newgvn test failure only occurred because of undef (because
of special handling of undef in phi's).
I think we'd have to move it to integer undef to still test the same thing.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Sanjay Patel via llvm-commits <
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: spatel
> Date: Thu Mar 8 06:57:08 2018
> New Revision: 327004
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=327004&view=rev
> Log:
> [InstCombine, NewGVN] remove FP undef from tests
>
> I'm trying to preserve the intent of these tests by using
> non-undef operands; if we fix FP undef folding these tests
> will not pass.
>
> Modified:
> llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-crash.ll
> llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/NewGVN/pr32607.ll
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-crash.ll
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/
> Transforms/InstCombine/select-crash.ll?rev=327004&r1=327003&
> r2=327004&view=diff
> ============================================================
> ==================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-crash.ll (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-crash.ll Thu Mar 8
> 06:57:08 2018
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ entry:
> %cmp86 = fcmp ogt double %highlights, 0.000000e+00
> %cond90 = select i1 %cmp86, double %sub24, double %add26
> %mul91 = fmul double %highlights, %cond90
> - %add94 = fadd double undef, %mul91
> + %add94 = fadd double %mul91, %mul91
> ret double %add94
> }
>
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/NewGVN/pr32607.ll
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/
> Transforms/NewGVN/pr32607.ll?rev=327004&r1=327003&r2=327004&view=diff
> ============================================================
> ==================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/NewGVN/pr32607.ll (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/NewGVN/pr32607.ll Thu Mar 8 06:57:08 2018
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ define hidden void @foo() {
> ; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[IF:%.*]]
> ; CHECK: if:
> ; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = phi double [ [[TMP1:%.*]], [[IF]] ], [
> undef, [[TOP:%.*]] ]
> -; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1]] = fadd double [[TMP0]], undef
> +; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1]] = fadd double [[TMP0]], 1.000000e+00
> ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 false, label [[L50:%.*]], label [[IF]]
> ; CHECK: L50:
> ; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 undef, i8* null
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ top:
>
> if: ; preds = %if, %top
> %0 = phi double [ %1, %if ], [ %.promoted, %top ]
> - %1 = fadd double %0, undef
> + %1 = fadd double %0, 1.0
> br i1 false, label %L50, label %if
>
> L50: ; preds = %if
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20180412/ebb4f4b4/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list