[PATCH] D44538: [ARM] Support for v4f16 and v8f16 vectors

[Tim Northover via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

t.p.northover added a comment.

Ah good, thanks for the explanation. Sounds like you were already doing exactly what I was thinking of and I started paying attention half-way through.

> I am now first going to rethink why we want to pass f16 vectors instead of sticking to i16.

I think either could work. Longer term we probably want <N x half> for tidiness, but It's probably not essential to begin with.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D44538