[llvm] r327660 - [X86] Make sure we use FSUB instruction as the reference for operand order in isAddSubOrSubAdd when recognizing subadd

Craig Topper via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 15 13:30:54 PDT 2018


Author: ctopper
Date: Thu Mar 15 13:30:54 2018
New Revision: 327660

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=327660&view=rev
Log:
[X86] Make sure we use FSUB instruction as the reference for operand order in isAddSubOrSubAdd when recognizing subadd

The FADD part of the addsub/subadd pattern can have its operands commuted, but when checking for fsubadd we were using the fadd as reference and commuting the fsub node.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/fmsubadd-combine.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp?rev=327660&r1=327659&r2=327660&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp Thu Mar 15 13:30:54 2018
@@ -30494,10 +30494,18 @@ static bool isAddSubOrSubAdd(SDNode *N,
 
   // Ensure that both operations have the same operands. Note that we can
   // commute the FADD operands.
-  SDValue LHS = V1->getOperand(0), RHS = V1->getOperand(1);
-  if ((V2->getOperand(0) != LHS || V2->getOperand(1) != RHS) &&
-      (V2->getOperand(0) != RHS || V2->getOperand(1) != LHS))
-    return false;
+  SDValue LHS, RHS;
+  if (ExpectedOpcode == ISD::FSUB) {
+    LHS = V1->getOperand(0); RHS = V1->getOperand(1);
+    if ((V2->getOperand(0) != LHS || V2->getOperand(1) != RHS) &&
+        (V2->getOperand(0) != RHS || V2->getOperand(1) != LHS))
+      return false;
+  } else {
+    LHS = V2->getOperand(0); RHS = V2->getOperand(1);
+    if ((V1->getOperand(0) != LHS || V1->getOperand(1) != RHS) &&
+        (V1->getOperand(0) != RHS || V1->getOperand(1) != LHS))
+      return false;
+  }
 
   // We're looking for blends between FADD and FSUB nodes. We insist on these
   // nodes being lined up in a specific expected pattern.

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/fmsubadd-combine.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/fmsubadd-combine.ll?rev=327660&r1=327659&r2=327660&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/fmsubadd-combine.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/fmsubadd-combine.ll Thu Mar 15 13:30:54 2018
@@ -134,14 +134,28 @@ entry:
 
 ; This should not be matched to fmsubadd because the mul is on the wrong side of the fsub.
 define <2 x double> @mul_subadd_bad_commute(<2 x double> %A, <2 x double> %B, <2 x double> %C) #0 {
-; FMA3-LABEL: mul_subadd_bad_commute:
-; FMA3:       # %bb.0: # %entry
-; FMA3-NEXT:    vfmsubadd213pd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm1 * xmm0) -/+ xmm2
-; FMA3-NEXT:    retq
+; FMA3_256-LABEL: mul_subadd_bad_commute:
+; FMA3_256:       # %bb.0: # %entry
+; FMA3_256-NEXT:    vmulpd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; FMA3_256-NEXT:    vsubpd %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm1
+; FMA3_256-NEXT:    vaddpd %xmm2, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; FMA3_256-NEXT:    vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1]
+; FMA3_256-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; FMA3_512-LABEL: mul_subadd_bad_commute:
+; FMA3_512:       # %bb.0: # %entry
+; FMA3_512-NEXT:    vmulpd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; FMA3_512-NEXT:    vsubpd %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm1
+; FMA3_512-NEXT:    vaddpd %xmm2, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; FMA3_512-NEXT:    vmovsd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1]
+; FMA3_512-NEXT:    retq
 ;
 ; FMA4-LABEL: mul_subadd_bad_commute:
 ; FMA4:       # %bb.0: # %entry
-; FMA4-NEXT:    vfmsubaddpd %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; FMA4-NEXT:    vmulpd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; FMA4-NEXT:    vsubpd %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm1
+; FMA4-NEXT:    vaddpd %xmm2, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; FMA4-NEXT:    vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1]
 ; FMA4-NEXT:    retq
 entry:
   %AB = fmul <2 x double> %A, %B




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list