[PATCH] D43140: [Dominators] Always recalculate postdominators when update yields different roots

[Jakub Kuderski via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL324962: [Dominators] Always recalculate postdominators when update yields different… (authored by kuhar, committed by ).

Changed prior to commit:
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D43140?vs=133678&id=133949#toc

Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D43140

Files:
  llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/GenericDomTreeConstruction.h


Index: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/GenericDomTreeConstruction.h
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/GenericDomTreeConstruction.h
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/GenericDomTreeConstruction.h
@@ -698,24 +698,20 @@
       return;
 
     // Recalculate the set of roots.
-    DT.Roots = FindRoots(DT, BUI);
-    for (const NodePtr R : DT.Roots) {
-      const TreeNodePtr TN = DT.getNode(R);
-      // A CFG node was selected as a tree root, but the corresponding tree node
-      // is not connected to the virtual root. This is because the incremental
-      // algorithm does not really know or use the set of roots and can make a
-      // different (implicit) decision about which nodes within an infinite loop
-      // becomes a root.
-      if (TN && !DT.isVirtualRoot(TN->getIDom())) {
-        DEBUG(dbgs() << "Root " << BlockNamePrinter(R)
-                     << " is not virtual root's child\n"
-                     << "The entire tree needs to be rebuilt\n");
-        // It should be possible to rotate the subtree instead of recalculating
-        // the whole tree, but this situation happens extremely rarely in
-        // practice.
-        CalculateFromScratch(DT, BUI);
-        return;
-      }
+    auto Roots = FindRoots(DT, BUI);
+    if (DT.Roots.size() != Roots.size() ||
+        !std::is_permutation(DT.Roots.begin(), DT.Roots.end(), Roots.begin())) {
+      // The roots chosen in the CFG have changed. This is because the
+      // incremental algorithm does not really know or use the set of roots and
+      // can make a different (implicit) decision about which node within an
+      // infinite loop becomes a root.
+
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "Roots are different in updated trees\n"
+                   << "The entire tree needs to be rebuilt\n");
+      // It may be possible to update the tree without recalculating it, but
+      // we do not know yet how to do it, and it happens rarely in practise.
+      CalculateFromScratch(DT, BUI);
+      return;
     }
   }
 
@@ -1660,8 +1656,17 @@
   case DomTreeT::VerificationLevel::Basic:
     return SNCA.verifyParentProperty(DT) && SNCA.IsSameAsFreshTree(DT);
 
-  case DomTreeT::VerificationLevel::Full:
-    return SNCA.verifyParentProperty(DT) && SNCA.verifySiblingProperty(DT);
+  case DomTreeT::VerificationLevel::Full: {
+    bool FullRes
+        = SNCA.verifyParentProperty(DT) && SNCA.verifySiblingProperty(DT);
+
+    // Postdominators depend on root selection, make sure that a fresh tree
+    // looks the same.
+    if (DT.isPostDominator())
+      FullRes &= SNCA.IsSameAsFreshTree(DT);
+
+    return FullRes;
+  }
   }
 
   llvm_unreachable("Unhandled DomTree VerificationLevel");


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D43140.133949.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2757 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20180212/ab1b025d/attachment.bin>