[PATCH] D41579: [X86] A fix for pr35741 - can't use comments with instr prefixes
Andrew V. Tischenko via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 26 10:30:59 PST 2017
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL321459: It's a fix for Bug 35741 - can't use comments after x86 prefixes. (authored by avt77, committed by ).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41579?vs=128157&id=128181#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41579
Files:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/MC/X86/x86-64.s
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
@@ -2377,10 +2377,11 @@
Flags |= Prefix;
Name = Parser.getTok().getString();
Parser.Lex(); // eat the prefix
- // Hack: we could have something like
+ // Hack: we could have something like "rep # some comment" or
// "lock; cmpxchg16b $1" or "lock\0A\09incl" or "lock/incl"
while (Name.startswith(";") || Name.startswith("\n") ||
- Name.startswith("\t") || Name.startswith("/")) {
+ Name.startswith("#") || Name.startswith("\t") ||
+ Name.startswith("/")) {
Name = Parser.getTok().getString();
Parser.Lex(); // go to next prefix or instr
}
Index: llvm/trunk/test/MC/X86/x86-64.s
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/MC/X86/x86-64.s
+++ llvm/trunk/test/MC/X86/x86-64.s
@@ -99,6 +99,10 @@
// CHECK: shll $2, %eax
sall $2, %eax
+// CHECK: rep movsb
+rep # comment
+movsb
+
// CHECK: rep
// CHECK: insb
rep;insb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D41579.128181.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1210 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20171226/65bc15b9/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list