[PATCH] D40383: Add RISCV privileged instructions

[Alex Bradbury via llvm-commits]

On 10 December 2017 at 12:02, David Craven <david at craven.ch> wrote:
>> Is there any reason not to include the ecall/ebreak instruction definitions in this patch? (My apologies - I should have directly asked this when commenting on the fact that ecall/ebreak tests were present but not the definitions).
>
> Aren't the ecall and ebreak instructions identical to the ones defined
> in the user level specification?

Of course - sorry for the confusion!