[llvm] r318487 - [PredicateInfo] Add comment about why we require stable sort
Mandeep Singh Grang via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 16 16:43:24 PST 2017
Author: mgrang
Date: Thu Nov 16 16:43:24 2017
New Revision: 318487
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=318487&view=rev
Log:
[PredicateInfo] Add comment about why we require stable sort
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/PredicateInfo.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/PredicateInfo.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/PredicateInfo.cpp?rev=318487&r1=318486&r2=318487&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/PredicateInfo.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/PredicateInfo.cpp Thu Nov 16 16:43:24 2017
@@ -611,6 +611,11 @@ void PredicateInfo::renameUses(SmallPtrS
}
convertUsesToDFSOrdered(Op, OrderedUses);
+ // Here we require a stable sort because we do not bother to try to
+ // assign an order to the operands the uses represent. Thus, two
+ // uses in the same instruction do not have a strict sort order
+ // currently and will be considered equal. We could get rid of the
+ // stable sort by creating one if we wanted.
std::stable_sort(OrderedUses.begin(), OrderedUses.end(), Compare);
SmallVector<ValueDFS, 8> RenameStack;
// For each use, sorted into dfs order, push values and replaces uses with
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list