[PATCH] D39453: [SCEV] Strengthen variance condition in calculateLoopDisposition
Max Kazantsev via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 10 05:26:50 PST 2017
mkazantsev updated this revision to Diff 122426.
mkazantsev added a comment.
Updated comments in code to make it more clear what is going on.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39453
Files:
lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/different-loops-recs.ll
Index: test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/different-loops-recs.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/different-loops-recs.ll
+++ test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/different-loops-recs.ll
@@ -510,3 +510,56 @@
%tmp10 = add i32 %iv.1.2, 3
ret void
}
+
+define i64 @test_09(i32 %param) {
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @test_09
+; CHECK: %iv1 = phi i64 [ %iv1.next, %guarded ], [ 0, %outer.loop ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop1>
+; CHECK: %iv1.trunc = trunc i64 %iv1 to i32
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {0,+,1}<%loop1>
+; CHECK: %iv1.next = add nuw nsw i64 %iv1, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop1>
+; CHECK: %iv2 = phi i32 [ %iv2.next, %loop2 ], [ %param, %loop2.preheader ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {%param,+,1}<%loop2>
+; CHECK: %iv2.next = add i32 %iv2, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> {(1 + %param),+,1}<%loop2>
+; CHECK: %iv2.ext = sext i32 %iv2.next to i64
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> (sext i32 {(1 + %param),+,1}<%loop2> to i64)
+; CHECK: %ret = mul i64 %iv1, %iv2.ext
+; CHECK-NEXT: --> ((sext i32 {(1 + %param),+,1}<%loop2> to i64) * {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop1>)
+
+entry:
+ br label %outer.loop
+
+outer.loop: ; preds = %loop2.exit, %entry
+ br label %loop1
+
+loop1: ; preds = %guarded, %outer.loop
+ %iv1 = phi i64 [ %iv1.next, %guarded ], [ 0, %outer.loop ]
+ %iv1.trunc = trunc i64 %iv1 to i32
+ %cond1 = icmp ult i64 %iv1, 100
+ br i1 %cond1, label %guarded, label %deopt
+
+guarded: ; preds = %loop1
+ %iv1.next = add nuw nsw i64 %iv1, 1
+ %tmp16 = icmp slt i32 %iv1.trunc, 2
+ br i1 %tmp16, label %loop1, label %loop2.preheader
+
+deopt: ; preds = %loop1
+ unreachable
+
+loop2.preheader: ; preds = %guarded
+ br label %loop2
+
+loop2: ; preds = %loop2, %loop2.preheader
+ %iv2 = phi i32 [ %iv2.next, %loop2 ], [ %param, %loop2.preheader ]
+ %iv2.next = add i32 %iv2, 1
+ %cond2 = icmp slt i32 %iv2, %iv1.trunc
+ br i1 %cond2, label %loop2, label %exit
+
+exit: ; preds = %loop2.exit
+ %iv2.ext = sext i32 %iv2.next to i64
+ %ret = mul i64 %iv1, %iv2.ext
+ ret i64 %ret
+}
Index: lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -10847,9 +10847,16 @@
if (!L)
return LoopVariant;
- // This recurrence is variant w.r.t. L if L contains AR's loop.
- if (L->contains(AR->getLoop()))
+ // If AR's loop is dominated by L, it's variant. This may happen if:
+ // a) L contains AR's loop, then AR changes within it;
+ // b) L and AR's loop are consecutive sibling loops, and L goes before the
+ // loop where AR is defined. It basically means that AR is not even
+ // available at the point of the loop L. We don't have a separate stance
+ // for such a situation, so we return 'Variant' in this case.
+ if (DT.dominates(L->getHeader(), AR->getLoop()->getHeader()))
return LoopVariant;
+ assert(!L->contains(AR->getLoop()) && "Containing loop's header does not"
+ " dominate the contained loop's header?");
// This recurrence is invariant w.r.t. L if AR's loop contains L.
if (AR->getLoop()->contains(L))
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D39453.122426.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3549 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20171110/7cf0825d/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list