[lld] r316863 - Fix ubsan error that shift amount 64 is too large.
Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Nov 4 17:10:20 PDT 2017
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> writes:
>
> > Modified: lld/trunk/ELF/InputFiles.cpp
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lld/trunk/ELF/
> InputFiles.cpp?rev=316863&r1=316862&r2=316863&view=diff
> > ============================================================
> ==================
> > --- lld/trunk/ELF/InputFiles.cpp (original)
> > +++ lld/trunk/ELF/InputFiles.cpp Sun Oct 29 09:49:42 2017
> > @@ -763,7 +763,9 @@ template <class ELFT> void SharedFile<EL
> > // files because the loader takes care of it. However, if we
> promote a
> > // DSO symbol to point to .bss due to copy relocation, we need to
> keep
> > // the original alignment requirements. We infer it here.
> > - uint32_t Alignment = 1ULL << countTrailingZeros((uint64_t)
> Sym.st_value);
> > + uint32_t Alignment = 1;
> > + if (Sym.st_value)
> > + Alignment = 1ULL << countTrailingZeros((uint64_t)Sym.st_value);
>
> This still implicitly discard information if st_value is aligned to more
> than 32 bits, no? Should Alignment be a uint_64?
>
Yes, but we use uint32_t to represent alignments everywhere in lld. In
practice, I don't think there's a point to support alignments larger than 4
GiB because I've never seen such large alignments. (If we really need it,
we probably should consider representing alignments in the form of N in 2^N
to save bits to store alignments.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20171104/a5868f44/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list