[llvm] r317355 - [cfi-verify] Add an interesting unit test where undef search length changes result.
Mitch Phillips via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 3 13:00:05 PDT 2017
Author: hctim
Date: Fri Nov 3 13:00:05 2017
New Revision: 317355
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=317355&view=rev
Log:
[cfi-verify] Add an interesting unit test where undef search length changes result.
Add an interesting unit test, found by changing --search-length-undef from the default. Program handles it correctly but good for ensuring correctness on further changes :)
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, kcc, vlad.tsyrklevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38658
Modified:
llvm/trunk/unittests/tools/llvm-cfi-verify/FileAnalysis.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/unittests/tools/llvm-cfi-verify/FileAnalysis.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/unittests/tools/llvm-cfi-verify/FileAnalysis.cpp?rev=317355&r1=317354&r2=317355&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/unittests/tools/llvm-cfi-verify/FileAnalysis.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/unittests/tools/llvm-cfi-verify/FileAnalysis.cpp Fri Nov 3 13:00:05 2017
@@ -650,7 +650,60 @@ TEST_F(BasicFileAnalysisTest, CFIProtect
0x0f, 0x0b, // 22: ud2
},
0xDEADBEEF);
+ uint64_t PrevSearchLengthForUndef = SearchLengthForUndef;
+ SearchLengthForUndef = 5;
EXPECT_FALSE(Analysis.isIndirectInstructionCFIProtected(0xDEADBEEF + 9));
+ SearchLengthForUndef = PrevSearchLengthForUndef;
+}
+
+TEST_F(BasicFileAnalysisTest, UndefSearchLengthOneTest) {
+ Analysis.parseSectionContents(
+ {
+ 0x77, 0x0d, // 0x688118: ja 0x688127 [+12]
+ 0x48, 0x89, 0xdf, // 0x68811a: mov %rbx, %rdi
+ 0xff, 0xd0, // 0x68811d: callq *%rax
+ 0x48, 0x89, 0xdf, // 0x68811f: mov %rbx, %rdi
+ 0xe8, 0x09, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // 0x688122: callq 0x688130
+ 0x0f, 0x0b, // 0x688127: ud2
+ },
+ 0x688118);
+ uint64_t PrevSearchLengthForUndef = SearchLengthForUndef;
+ SearchLengthForUndef = 1;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Analysis.isIndirectInstructionCFIProtected(0x68811d));
+ SearchLengthForUndef = PrevSearchLengthForUndef;
+}
+
+TEST_F(BasicFileAnalysisTest, UndefSearchLengthOneTestFarAway) {
+ Analysis.parseSectionContents(
+ {
+ 0x74, 0x73, // 0x7759eb: je 0x775a60
+ 0xe9, 0x1c, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // 0x7759ed: jmpq 0x775e0e
+ },
+ 0x7759eb);
+
+ Analysis.parseSectionContents(
+ {
+ 0x0f, 0x85, 0xb2, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, // 0x775a56: jne 0x775e0e
+ 0x48, 0x83, 0xc3, 0xf4, // 0x775a5c: add $0xfffffffffffffff4,%rbx
+ 0x48, 0x8b, 0x7c, 0x24, 0x10, // 0x775a60: mov 0x10(%rsp),%rdi
+ 0x48, 0x89, 0xde, // 0x775a65: mov %rbx,%rsi
+ 0xff, 0xd1, // 0x775a68: callq *%rcx
+ },
+ 0x775a56);
+
+ Analysis.parseSectionContents(
+ {
+ 0x0f, 0x0b, // 0x775e0e: ud2
+ },
+ 0x775e0e);
+ uint64_t PrevSearchLengthForUndef = SearchLengthForUndef;
+ SearchLengthForUndef = 1;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(Analysis.isIndirectInstructionCFIProtected(0x775a68));
+ SearchLengthForUndef = 2;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Analysis.isIndirectInstructionCFIProtected(0x775a68));
+ SearchLengthForUndef = 3;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Analysis.isIndirectInstructionCFIProtected(0x775a68));
+ SearchLengthForUndef = PrevSearchLengthForUndef;
}
} // anonymous namespace
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list