[PATCH] D39384: Add and make use of llvm::for_each

[David Blaikie via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

dblaikie accepted this revision.
dblaikie added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

I still feel like for_each might as well change to range-based-for. Some of these examples are admittedly a bit awkward as range-based-for & I doubt there's going to be a big proliferation of for_each from people who don't know range-for is there, so doesn't seem like there's much harm/risk to having this for the few cases it can be handy for. (:


https://reviews.llvm.org/D39384