[lld] r316811 - Inline trivial symbol constructors.

[Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-commits]

Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes:

> They are now written in class declarations, so they are inlined, no?

At least from "inlined" I understand going from


int f() { return 42; }
int g() { return f(); }

to

int f() { return 42; }
int g() { return 42; }

what you did was

inilne int f() { return 42; }
int g() { return f(); }

which I would says is not inlining f, is making f an inline function.

Cheers,
Rafael