[lld] r316811 - Inline trivial symbol constructors.
Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 31 07:03:43 PDT 2017
Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes:
> They are now written in class declarations, so they are inlined, no?
At least from "inlined" I understand going from
int f() { return 42; }
int g() { return f(); }
to
int f() { return 42; }
int g() { return 42; }
what you did was
inilne int f() { return 42; }
int g() { return f(); }
which I would says is not inlining f, is making f an inline function.
Cheers,
Rafael
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list