[llvm] r316423 - [ARM] Replace development diagnostics with normal DEBUG macro
Oliver Stannard via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 24 02:46:56 PDT 2017
Author: olista01
Date: Tue Oct 24 02:46:56 2017
New Revision: 316423
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=316423&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Replace development diagnostics with normal DEBUG macro
* Remove the -arm-asm-parser-dev-diags option.
* Use normal DEBUG(dbgs()) printing for the extra development information about
missing diagnostics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39194
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp?rev=316423&r1=316422&r2=316423&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/AsmParser/ARMAsmParser.cpp Tue Oct 24 02:46:56 2017
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@
#include <utility>
#include <vector>
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "asm-parser"
+
using namespace llvm;
namespace {
@@ -85,11 +87,6 @@ static cl::opt<ImplicitItModeTy> Implici
static cl::opt<bool> AddBuildAttributes("arm-add-build-attributes",
cl::init(false));
-cl::opt<bool>
-DevDiags("arm-asm-parser-dev-diags", cl::init(false),
- cl::desc("Use extended diagnostics, which include implementation "
- "details useful for development"));
-
enum VectorLaneTy { NoLanes, AllLanes, IndexedLane };
class UnwindContext {
@@ -10200,18 +10197,16 @@ ARMAsmParser::FilterNearMisses(SmallVect
NearMissMessage Message;
Message.Loc = OperandLoc;
- raw_svector_ostream OS(Message.Message);
if (OperandDiag) {
- OS << OperandDiag;
+ Message.Message = OperandDiag;
} else if (I.getOperandClass() == InvalidMatchClass) {
- OS << "too many operands for instruction";
+ Message.Message = "too many operands for instruction";
} else {
- OS << "invalid operand for instruction";
- if (DevDiags) {
- OS << " class" << I.getOperandClass() << ", error "
- << I.getOperandError() << ", opcode "
- << MII.getName(I.getOpcode());
- }
+ Message.Message = "invalid operand for instruction";
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "Missing diagnostic string for operand class " <<
+ getMatchClassName((MatchClassKind)I.getOperandClass())
+ << I.getOperandClass() << ", error " << I.getOperandError()
+ << ", opcode " << MII.getName(I.getOpcode()) << "\n");
}
NearMissesOut.emplace_back(Message);
break;
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list