[PATCH] D38554: Fixed ppc32 function relocations in non-pic mode

[vit9696 via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

vit9696 added subscribers: davide, ruiu.
vit9696 added a comment.

So, am I right that the correct approach is to add an additional check whether eabi target is used?
Another way is to ensure that lld handles PLT relocations and solves them as relative relocations if possible.
I think that both changes should be made regardless of the reasons behind, but I would like to hear the opinion of @ruiu and @davide from lld project first.

TL;DR latest llvm completely breaks compatibility with lld for ppc32 target, and even a simple program won't be linked due to unsupported PLT relocations llvm emits. I could submit a patch solving PLTREL relocations for local symbols, however, adding full PLT support to lld will require more effort than I could spend on this issue.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D38554