[PATCH] D38944: [GVN] Handle removal of first implicit CF instruction correctly
Daniel Berlin via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 16 07:37:19 PDT 2017
dberlin added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp:1202
if (MD) MD->removeInstruction(I);
- I->eraseFromParent();
+ eraseFromParent(I);
}
----------------
Please don't do this.
Just mark them all for deletion, unless there is a very good reason not to.
================
Comment at: lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp:2106
DEBUG(verifyRemoved(*I));
- (*I)->eraseFromParent();
+ eraseFromParent(*I);
}
----------------
If you are going to try to abstract the deletion, you should do all the updating this wants (IE MD->removeInstrruction, etc)
Please don't call it eraseFromPaernt, that's meaningless. Please call it deleteInstruction or something
================
Comment at: lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp:2303
DEBUG(verifyRemoved(CurInst));
- CurInst->eraseFromParent();
- OI->invalidateBlock(CurrentBlock);
+ eraseFromParent(CurInst);
++NumGVNInstr;
----------------
Ditto
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38944
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list