[PATCH] D37893: [X86] Prefer VPERMQ over VPERM2F128 for any unary shuffle, not just the ones that can be done with a insertf128

Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 15 10:55:05 PDT 2017

Previous message: [PATCH] D37893: [X86] Prefer VPERMQ over VPERM2F128 for any unary shuffle, not just the ones that can be done with a insertf128
Next message: [PATCH] D37893: [X86] Prefer VPERMQ over VPERM2F128 for any unary shuffle, not just the ones that can be done with a insertf128
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RKSimon accepted this revision.
RKSimon added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM


https://reviews.llvm.org/D37893

Previous message: [PATCH] D37893: [X86] Prefer VPERMQ over VPERM2F128 for any unary shuffle, not just the ones that can be done with a insertf128
Next message: [PATCH] D37893: [X86] Prefer VPERMQ over VPERM2F128 for any unary shuffle, not just the ones that can be done with a insertf128
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list