[PATCH] D36097: Prototype fix for lld DWARF parsing of base address selection entries in range lists

[George Rimar via llvm-commits]

> Seems OK? If the code were at fixed/predefined offsets. What does this code do when run on executables, where the section index isn't available because the > relocations have already been applied, for example? Why doesn't it assert then as well?


You right, I forgot about executables, this assert is excessive then.
We probably do not have executables in testcases which has DW_AT_low_pc != 0 currently,
so it did not assert for me because of this.?

George.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170830/64a31b10/attachment.html>