[PATCH] D37264: [Docs] Update CodingStandards to recommend range-based for loops

[Chris Lattner via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

lattner added a comment.

FWIW, I agree with @majnemer's comments here: use of auto in those places doesn't aid in understanding/maintainability of the code, and it is important to mention that the manual loop with an explicitly evaluated end can make sense if the sequence is being mutated in the loop (but also we should recommend a comment to make that explicit!)

-Chris


https://reviews.llvm.org/D37264