[llvm] r310547 - [LCG] Fix an assert in a on-scope-exit lambda that checked the contents
Chandler Carruth via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 9 20:05:21 PDT 2017
Author: chandlerc
Date: Wed Aug 9 20:05:21 2017
New Revision: 310547
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=310547&view=rev
Log:
[LCG] Fix an assert in a on-scope-exit lambda that checked the contents
of the returned value.
Checking the returned value from inside of a scoped exit isn't actually
valid. It happens to work when NRVO fires and the stars align, which
they reliably do with Clang but don't, for example, on MSVC builds.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.cpp?rev=310547&r1=310546&r2=310547&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.cpp Wed Aug 9 20:05:21 2017
@@ -1105,14 +1105,10 @@ LazyCallGraph::RefSCC::removeInternalRef
// or we return new RefSCCs and this RefSCC is dead.
verify();
auto VerifyOnExit = make_scope_exit([&]() {
- if (Result.empty()) {
+ // If we didn't replace our RefSCC with new ones, check that this one
+ // remains valid.
+ if (G)
verify();
- } else {
- assert(!G && "A dead RefSCC should have its graph pointer nulled.");
- assert(SCCs.empty() && "A dead RefSCC should have no SCCs in it.");
- for (RefSCC *RC : Result)
- RC->verify();
- }
});
#endif
@@ -1325,6 +1321,12 @@ LazyCallGraph::RefSCC::removeInternalRef
SCCs.clear();
SCCIndices.clear();
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+ // Verify the new RefSCCs we've built.
+ for (RefSCC *RC : Result)
+ RC->verify();
+#endif
+
// Return the new list of SCCs.
return Result;
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list