[PATCH] D34795: Supporting -f(no)-reorder-functions flag, llvm side change

Taewook Oh via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 31 09:55:36 PDT 2017

Previous message: [PATCH] D34795: Supporting -f(no)-reorder-functions flag, llvm side change
Next message: [PATCH] D35566: [DAG] Extend visitSCALAR_TO_VECTOR optimization to truncated vector.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

twoh added a comment.

@davidxl I think it is theoretically possible, if the `if` branch is not taken on line 294. Did I miss something? Thanks!


https://reviews.llvm.org/D34795

Previous message: [PATCH] D34795: Supporting -f(no)-reorder-functions flag, llvm side change
Next message: [PATCH] D35566: [DAG] Extend visitSCALAR_TO_VECTOR optimization to truncated vector.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list