[PATCH] D35334: ThinLTO Minimized Bitcode File Size Reduction
Haojie Wang via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 18 17:32:15 PDT 2017
haojiewang added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp:124
/// be used in the backend.
ModuleHash *ModHash;
----------------
haojiewang wrote:
> pcc wrote:
> > haojiewang wrote:
> > > pcc wrote:
> > > > I think this change removes the need to support writing a module with a precomputed hash from ModuleBitcodeWriter. Can you please remove that functionality?
> > > Writing a module with a precomputed hash is still needed while split writing a module(splitAndWriteThinLTOBitcode), because I didn't touch the split writing in this patch. Maybe I should also change the writer in split writing?
> > You mean here?
> > http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/lib/Transforms/IPO/ThinLTOBitcodeWriter.cpp#386
> >
> > Yes, I think you can change that to call writeThinLinkBitcode.
> I just tried to change the split writing, but there were bunch of errors in test after I did that. There will be 11 test files should be updated if we change this, and most of them are because llvm-dis cannot read a thin link bitcode file. Should we do it in this patch or leave it the next patch? How should we update them, just changing llvm-dis to llvm-bcanalyzer or also adding the CHECKs and CHECK-NOTs as in the test file of this patch?
I'm just not sure if I would affect other people's code if I do so much changes on the test files.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35334
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list