[PATCH] D34744: [DWARF] - Simplify HandleExpectedError implementation in DWARFDebugInfoTest

George Rimar via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 29 07:49:48 PDT 2017


> Is it possible to add a function to the test class called is ConfigurationSupported() that returns true or false but doesn't deal with Expected's, and if it returns true then > we can expect the call later to succeed, at which point we can use the macro??


Sounds good, I'll try to find how to do that.


George.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170629/7eb002b0/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list