[PATCH] D34702: [DependenceAnalysis] Make sure base objects are the same when comparing GEPs

Brendon Cahoon via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 28 10:49:54 PDT 2017


bcahoon updated this revision to Diff 104460.
bcahoon added a comment.

Hi Philip - thanks for the review. I made the changes you suggested.

This version uses isKnownPredicate to compare the base pointers.  I've combined the two test cases in to file.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D34702

Files:
  lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
  test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll


Index: test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
+++ test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -basicaa -da  | FileCheck %s
+
+; Test that the dependence analysis generates the correct results when using
+; an aliased object that points to a different element in the same array.
+; PR33567 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33567
+
+; void test1(int *A, int *B, int N) {
+;   int *top = A;
+;  int *bot = A + N/2;
+;   for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+;     B[i] = top[i] + bot[i];
+; }
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: test1
+; CHECK: da analyze - input [*|<]!
+
+define void @test1(i32* nocapture %A, i32* nocapture %B, i32 %N) #0 {
+entry:
+  %cmp9 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 0
+  br i1 %cmp9, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
+
+for.body.lr.ph:
+  %div = sdiv i32 %N, 2
+  %bot.gep = getelementptr i32, i32* %A, i32 %div
+  br label %for.body
+
+for.body:
+  %i = phi i32 [ 0, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
+  %gep.0 = getelementptr i32, i32* %A, i32 %i
+  %gep.1 = getelementptr i32, i32* %bot.gep, i32 %i
+  %gep.B = getelementptr i32, i32* %B, i32 %i
+  %0 = load i32, i32* %gep.0, align 4
+  %1 = load i32, i32* %gep.1, align 4
+  %add = add nsw i32 %1, %0
+  store i32 %add, i32* %gep.B, align 4
+  %inc = add nsw i32 %i, 1
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %inc, %N
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
+
+for.end:
+  ret void
+}
+
+
+; void test2(int *A, unsigned n) {
+;  int *B = A + 1;
+;  for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
+;    A[i] = B[i];
+;  }
+; }
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: test2
+; CHECK: da analyze - consistent anti [1]!
+
+define void @test2(i32*, i32) #3 {
+  %3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %0, i64 1
+  br label %4
+
+; <label>:4:
+  %.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %2 ], [ %14, %13 ]
+  %5 = sub i32 %1, 1
+  %6 = icmp ult i32 %.0, %5
+  br i1 %6, label %7, label %15
+
+; <label>:7:
+  %8 = zext i32 %.0 to i64
+  %9 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %3, i64 %8
+  %10 = load i32, i32* %9, align 4
+  %11 = zext i32 %.0 to i64
+  %12 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %0, i64 %11
+  store i32 %10, i32* %12, align 4
+  br label %13
+
+; <label>:13:
+  %14 = add i32 %.0, 1
+  br label %4
+
+; <label>:15:
+  ret void
+}
Index: lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
+++ lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
@@ -3342,7 +3342,8 @@
 
     UsefulGEP = isLoopInvariant(SrcPtrSCEV, LI->getLoopFor(Src->getParent())) &&
                 isLoopInvariant(DstPtrSCEV, LI->getLoopFor(Dst->getParent())) &&
-                (SrcGEP->getNumOperands() == DstGEP->getNumOperands());
+                (SrcGEP->getNumOperands() == DstGEP->getNumOperands()) &&
+                isKnownPredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_EQ, SrcPtrSCEV, DstPtrSCEV);
   }
   unsigned Pairs = UsefulGEP ? SrcGEP->idx_end() - SrcGEP->idx_begin() : 1;
   SmallVector<Subscript, 4> Pair(Pairs);


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D34702.104460.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3038 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170628/1a1cb76a/attachment.bin>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list