[PATCH] D34702: [DependenceAnalysis] Make sure base objects are the same when comparing GEPs
Brendon Cahoon via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 28 10:49:54 PDT 2017
bcahoon updated this revision to Diff 104460.
bcahoon added a comment.
Hi Philip - thanks for the review. I made the changes you suggested.
This version uses isKnownPredicate to compare the base pointers. I've combined the two test cases in to file.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34702
Files:
lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
Index: test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
+++ test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -basicaa -da | FileCheck %s
+
+; Test that the dependence analysis generates the correct results when using
+; an aliased object that points to a different element in the same array.
+; PR33567 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33567
+
+; void test1(int *A, int *B, int N) {
+; int *top = A;
+; int *bot = A + N/2;
+; for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+; B[i] = top[i] + bot[i];
+; }
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: test1
+; CHECK: da analyze - input [*|<]!
+
+define void @test1(i32* nocapture %A, i32* nocapture %B, i32 %N) #0 {
+entry:
+ %cmp9 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 0
+ br i1 %cmp9, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
+
+for.body.lr.ph:
+ %div = sdiv i32 %N, 2
+ %bot.gep = getelementptr i32, i32* %A, i32 %div
+ br label %for.body
+
+for.body:
+ %i = phi i32 [ 0, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
+ %gep.0 = getelementptr i32, i32* %A, i32 %i
+ %gep.1 = getelementptr i32, i32* %bot.gep, i32 %i
+ %gep.B = getelementptr i32, i32* %B, i32 %i
+ %0 = load i32, i32* %gep.0, align 4
+ %1 = load i32, i32* %gep.1, align 4
+ %add = add nsw i32 %1, %0
+ store i32 %add, i32* %gep.B, align 4
+ %inc = add nsw i32 %i, 1
+ %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %inc, %N
+ br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
+
+for.end:
+ ret void
+}
+
+
+; void test2(int *A, unsigned n) {
+; int *B = A + 1;
+; for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
+; A[i] = B[i];
+; }
+; }
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: test2
+; CHECK: da analyze - consistent anti [1]!
+
+define void @test2(i32*, i32) #3 {
+ %3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %0, i64 1
+ br label %4
+
+; <label>:4:
+ %.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %2 ], [ %14, %13 ]
+ %5 = sub i32 %1, 1
+ %6 = icmp ult i32 %.0, %5
+ br i1 %6, label %7, label %15
+
+; <label>:7:
+ %8 = zext i32 %.0 to i64
+ %9 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %3, i64 %8
+ %10 = load i32, i32* %9, align 4
+ %11 = zext i32 %.0 to i64
+ %12 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %0, i64 %11
+ store i32 %10, i32* %12, align 4
+ br label %13
+
+; <label>:13:
+ %14 = add i32 %.0, 1
+ br label %4
+
+; <label>:15:
+ ret void
+}
Index: lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
+++ lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
@@ -3342,7 +3342,8 @@
UsefulGEP = isLoopInvariant(SrcPtrSCEV, LI->getLoopFor(Src->getParent())) &&
isLoopInvariant(DstPtrSCEV, LI->getLoopFor(Dst->getParent())) &&
- (SrcGEP->getNumOperands() == DstGEP->getNumOperands());
+ (SrcGEP->getNumOperands() == DstGEP->getNumOperands()) &&
+ isKnownPredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_EQ, SrcPtrSCEV, DstPtrSCEV);
}
unsigned Pairs = UsefulGEP ? SrcGEP->idx_end() - SrcGEP->idx_begin() : 1;
SmallVector<Subscript, 4> Pair(Pairs);
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D34702.104460.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3038 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170628/1a1cb76a/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list