[PATCH] D34601: [X86][LLVM]Expanding Supports lowerInterleavedStore() in X86InterleavedAccess.

[michael zuckerman via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

m_zuckerman added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34601#789983, @RKSimon wrote:

> Would it be beneficial to work on a more general solution for the 128-bit subvector issue? Won't 16x16 and 8x32 (as well as all the 512-bit equivalents) still suffer?


In general, we plan to generalize the problem and this is why we added the two mask functions.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D34601