[llvm] r306257 - [LoopSimplify] Re-instate r306081 with a bug fix w.r.t. indirectbr.

Chandler Carruth via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 25 15:45:32 PDT 2017


Author: chandlerc
Date: Sun Jun 25 15:45:31 2017
New Revision: 306257

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=306257&view=rev
Log:
[LoopSimplify] Re-instate r306081 with a bug fix w.r.t. indirectbr.

This was reverted in r306252, but I already had the bug fixed and was
just trying to form a test case.

The original commit factored the logic for forming dedicated exits
inside of LoopSimplify into a helper that could be used elsewhere and
with an approach that required fewer intermediate data structures. See
that commit for full details including the change to the statistic, etc.

The code looked fine to me and my reviewers, but in fact didn't handle
indirectbr correctly -- it left the 'InLoopPredecessors' vector dirty.

If you have code that looks *just* right, you can end up leaking these
predecessors into a subsequent rewrite, and crash deep down when trying
to update PHI nodes for predecessors that don't exist.

I've added an assert that makes the bug much more obvious, and then
changed the code to reliably clear the vector so we don't get this bug
again in some other form as the code changes.

I've also added a test case that *does* manage to catch this while also
giving some nice positive coverage in the face of indirectbr.

The real code that found this came out of what I think is CPython's
interpreter loop, but any code with really "creative" interpreter loops
mixing indirectbr and other exit paths could manage to tickle the bug.
I was hard to reduce the original test case because in addition to
having a particular pattern of IR, the whole thing depends on the order
of the predecessors which is in turn depends on use list order. The test
case added here was designed so that in multiple different predecessor
orderings it should always end up going down the same path and tripping
the same bug. I hope. At least, it tripped it for me without
manipulating the use list order which is better than anything bugpoint
could do...

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h
    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp
    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopSimplify/basictest.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-SimpleSwitch.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches-Threshold.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h?rev=306257&r1=306256&r2=306257&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h Sun Jun 25 15:45:31 2017
@@ -362,6 +362,14 @@ private:
 BasicBlock *InsertPreheaderForLoop(Loop *L, DominatorTree *DT, LoopInfo *LI,
                                    bool PreserveLCSSA);
 
+/// Ensure that all exit blocks of the loop are dedicated exits.
+///
+/// For any loop exit block with non-loop predecessors, we split the loop
+/// predecessors to use a dedicated loop exit block. We update the dominator
+/// tree and loop info if provided, and will preserve LCSSA if requested.
+bool formDedicatedExitBlocks(Loop *L, DominatorTree *DT, LoopInfo *LI,
+                             bool PreserveLCSSA);
+
 /// Ensures LCSSA form for every instruction from the Worklist in the scope of
 /// innermost containing loop.
 ///

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp?rev=306257&r1=306256&r2=306257&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp Sun Jun 25 15:45:31 2017
@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ using namespace llvm;
 
 #define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-simplify"
 
-STATISTIC(NumInserted, "Number of pre-header or exit blocks inserted");
 STATISTIC(NumNested  , "Number of nested loops split out");
 
 // If the block isn't already, move the new block to right after some 'outside
@@ -152,37 +151,6 @@ BasicBlock *llvm::InsertPreheaderForLoop
   return PreheaderBB;
 }
 
-/// \brief Ensure that the loop preheader dominates all exit blocks.
-///
-/// This method is used to split exit blocks that have predecessors outside of
-/// the loop.
-static BasicBlock *rewriteLoopExitBlock(Loop *L, BasicBlock *Exit,
-                                        DominatorTree *DT, LoopInfo *LI,
-                                        bool PreserveLCSSA) {
-  SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 8> LoopBlocks;
-  for (pred_iterator I = pred_begin(Exit), E = pred_end(Exit); I != E; ++I) {
-    BasicBlock *P = *I;
-    if (L->contains(P)) {
-      // Don't do this if the loop is exited via an indirect branch.
-      if (isa<IndirectBrInst>(P->getTerminator())) return nullptr;
-
-      LoopBlocks.push_back(P);
-    }
-  }
-
-  assert(!LoopBlocks.empty() && "No edges coming in from outside the loop?");
-  BasicBlock *NewExitBB = nullptr;
-
-  NewExitBB = SplitBlockPredecessors(Exit, LoopBlocks, ".loopexit", DT, LI,
-                                     PreserveLCSSA);
-  if (!NewExitBB)
-    return nullptr;
-
-  DEBUG(dbgs() << "LoopSimplify: Creating dedicated exit block "
-               << NewExitBB->getName() << "\n");
-  return NewExitBB;
-}
-
 /// Add the specified block, and all of its predecessors, to the specified set,
 /// if it's not already in there.  Stop predecessor traversal when we reach
 /// StopBlock.
@@ -346,16 +314,7 @@ static Loop *separateNestedLoop(Loop *L,
 
   // Split edges to exit blocks from the inner loop, if they emerged in the
   // process of separating the outer one.
-  SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> ExitBlocks;
-  L->getExitBlocks(ExitBlocks);
-  SmallSetVector<BasicBlock *, 8> ExitBlockSet(ExitBlocks.begin(),
-                                               ExitBlocks.end());
-  for (BasicBlock *ExitBlock : ExitBlockSet) {
-    if (any_of(predecessors(ExitBlock),
-               [L](BasicBlock *BB) { return !L->contains(BB); })) {
-      rewriteLoopExitBlock(L, ExitBlock, DT, LI, PreserveLCSSA);
-    }
-  }
+  formDedicatedExitBlocks(L, DT, LI, PreserveLCSSA);
 
   if (PreserveLCSSA) {
     // Fix LCSSA form for L. Some values, which previously were only used inside
@@ -563,29 +522,16 @@ ReprocessLoop:
   BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
   if (!Preheader) {
     Preheader = InsertPreheaderForLoop(L, DT, LI, PreserveLCSSA);
-    if (Preheader) {
-      ++NumInserted;
+    if (Preheader)
       Changed = true;
-    }
   }
 
   // Next, check to make sure that all exit nodes of the loop only have
   // predecessors that are inside of the loop.  This check guarantees that the
   // loop preheader/header will dominate the exit blocks.  If the exit block has
   // predecessors from outside of the loop, split the edge now.
-  SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 8> ExitBlocks;
-  L->getExitBlocks(ExitBlocks);
-
-  SmallSetVector<BasicBlock *, 8> ExitBlockSet(ExitBlocks.begin(),
-                                               ExitBlocks.end());
-  for (BasicBlock *ExitBlock : ExitBlockSet) {
-    if (any_of(predecessors(ExitBlock),
-               [L](BasicBlock *BB) { return !L->contains(BB); })) {
-      rewriteLoopExitBlock(L, ExitBlock, DT, LI, PreserveLCSSA);
-      ++NumInserted;
-      Changed = true;
-    }
-  }
+  if (formDedicatedExitBlocks(L, DT, LI, PreserveLCSSA))
+    Changed = true;
 
   // If the header has more than two predecessors at this point (from the
   // preheader and from multiple backedges), we must adjust the loop.
@@ -614,10 +560,8 @@ ReprocessLoop:
     // insert a new block that all backedges target, then make it jump to the
     // loop header.
     LoopLatch = insertUniqueBackedgeBlock(L, Preheader, DT, LI);
-    if (LoopLatch) {
-      ++NumInserted;
+    if (LoopLatch)
       Changed = true;
-    }
   }
 
   const DataLayout &DL = L->getHeader()->getModule()->getDataLayout();
@@ -645,7 +589,22 @@ ReprocessLoop:
   // loop-invariant instructions out of the way to open up more
   // opportunities, and the disadvantage of having the responsibility
   // to preserve dominator information.
-  if (ExitBlockSet.size() == 1) {
+  auto HasUniqueExitBlock = [&]() {
+    BasicBlock *UniqueExit = nullptr;
+    for (auto *ExitingBB : ExitingBlocks)
+      for (auto *SuccBB : successors(ExitingBB)) {
+        if (L->contains(SuccBB))
+          continue;
+
+        if (!UniqueExit)
+          UniqueExit = SuccBB;
+        else if (UniqueExit != SuccBB)
+          return false;
+      }
+
+    return true;
+  };
+  if (HasUniqueExitBlock()) {
     for (unsigned i = 0, e = ExitingBlocks.size(); i != e; ++i) {
       BasicBlock *ExitingBlock = ExitingBlocks[i];
       if (!ExitingBlock->getSinglePredecessor()) continue;

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.cpp?rev=306257&r1=306256&r2=306257&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.cpp Sun Jun 25 15:45:31 2017
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/ScopeExit.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/GlobalsModRef.h"
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@
 #include "llvm/IR/ValueHandle.h"
 #include "llvm/Pass.h"
 #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
 
 using namespace llvm;
 using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
@@ -922,6 +924,69 @@ bool InductionDescriptor::isInductionPHI
   return true;
 }
 
+bool llvm::formDedicatedExitBlocks(Loop *L, DominatorTree *DT, LoopInfo *LI,
+                                   bool PreserveLCSSA) {
+  bool Changed = false;
+
+  // We re-use a vector for the in-loop predecesosrs.
+  SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> InLoopPredecessors;
+
+  auto RewriteExit = [&](BasicBlock *BB) {
+    assert(InLoopPredecessors.empty() &&
+           "Must start with an empty predecessors list!");
+    auto Cleanup = make_scope_exit([&] { InLoopPredecessors.clear(); });
+
+    // See if there are any non-loop predecessors of this exit block and
+    // keep track of the in-loop predecessors.
+    bool IsDedicatedExit = true;
+    for (auto *PredBB : predecessors(BB))
+      if (L->contains(PredBB)) {
+        if (isa<IndirectBrInst>(PredBB->getTerminator()))
+          // We cannot rewrite exiting edges from an indirectbr.
+          return false;
+
+        InLoopPredecessors.push_back(PredBB);
+      } else {
+        IsDedicatedExit = false;
+      }
+
+    assert(!InLoopPredecessors.empty() && "Must have *some* loop predecessor!");
+
+    // Nothing to do if this is already a dedicated exit.
+    if (IsDedicatedExit)
+      return false;
+
+    auto *NewExitBB = SplitBlockPredecessors(
+        BB, InLoopPredecessors, ".loopexit", DT, LI, PreserveLCSSA);
+
+    if (!NewExitBB)
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "WARNING: Can't create a dedicated exit block for loop: "
+                   << *L << "\n");
+    else
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LoopSimplify: Creating dedicated exit block "
+                   << NewExitBB->getName() << "\n");
+    return true;
+  };
+
+  // Walk the exit blocks directly rather than building up a data structure for
+  // them, but only visit each one once.
+  SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock *, 4> Visited;
+  for (auto *BB : L->blocks())
+    for (auto *SuccBB : successors(BB)) {
+      // We're looking for exit blocks so skip in-loop successors.
+      if (L->contains(SuccBB))
+        continue;
+
+      // Visit each exit block exactly once.
+      if (!Visited.insert(SuccBB).second)
+        continue;
+
+      Changed |= RewriteExit(SuccBB);
+    }
+
+  return Changed;
+}
+
 /// \brief Returns the instructions that use values defined in the loop.
 SmallVector<Instruction *, 8> llvm::findDefsUsedOutsideOfLoop(Loop *L) {
   SmallVector<Instruction *, 8> UsedOutside;

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopSimplify/basictest.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopSimplify/basictest.ll?rev=306257&r1=306256&r2=306257&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopSimplify/basictest.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopSimplify/basictest.ll Sun Jun 25 15:45:31 2017
@@ -153,3 +153,84 @@ non_dedicated_exit:
 ; CHECK:      non_dedicated_exit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   ret void
 }
+
+; Check that we form what dedicated exits we can even when some exits are
+; reached via indirectbr which precludes forming dedicated exits.
+define void @test_form_some_dedicated_exits_despite_indirectbr(i8 %a, i8* %ptr, i8** %addr.ptr) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test_form_some_dedicated_exits_despite_indirectbr(
+entry:
+  switch i8 %a, label %loop.ph [
+    i8 0, label %exit.a
+    i8 1, label %exit.b
+    i8 2, label %exit.c
+  ]
+; CHECK:      entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   switch i8 %a, label %loop.ph [
+; CHECK-NEXT:     i8 0, label %exit.a
+; CHECK-NEXT:     i8 1, label %exit.b
+; CHECK-NEXT:     i8 2, label %exit.c
+; CHECK-NEXT:   ]
+
+loop.ph:
+  br label %loop.header
+; CHECK:      loop.ph:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   br label %loop.header
+
+loop.header:
+  %addr1 = load volatile i8*, i8** %addr.ptr
+  indirectbr i8* %addr1, [label %loop.body1, label %exit.a]
+; CHECK:      loop.header:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   %[[ADDR1:.*]] = load volatile i8*, i8** %addr.ptr
+; CHECK-NEXT:   indirectbr i8* %[[ADDR1]], [label %loop.body1, label %exit.a]
+
+loop.body1:
+  %b = load volatile i8, i8* %ptr
+  switch i8 %b, label %loop.body2 [
+    i8 0, label %exit.a
+    i8 1, label %exit.b
+    i8 2, label %exit.c
+  ]
+; CHECK:      loop.body1:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   %[[B:.*]] = load volatile i8, i8* %ptr
+; CHECK-NEXT:   switch i8 %[[B]], label %loop.body2 [
+; CHECK-NEXT:     i8 0, label %exit.a
+; CHECK-NEXT:     i8 1, label %[[LOOPEXIT:.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:     i8 2, label %exit.c
+; CHECK-NEXT:   ]
+
+loop.body2:
+  %addr2 = load volatile i8*, i8** %addr.ptr
+  indirectbr i8* %addr2, [label %loop.backedge, label %exit.c]
+; CHECK:      loop.body2:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   %[[ADDR2:.*]] = load volatile i8*, i8** %addr.ptr
+; CHECK-NEXT:   indirectbr i8* %[[ADDR2]], [label %loop.backedge, label %exit.c]
+
+loop.backedge:
+  br label %loop.header
+; CHECK:      loop.backedge:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   br label %loop.header
+
+exit.a:
+  ret void
+; Check that there isn't a split loop exit.
+; CHECK-NOT:    br label %exit.a
+;
+; CHECK:      exit.a:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   ret void
+
+exit.b:
+  ret void
+; CHECK:      [[LOOPEXIT]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   br label %exit.b
+;
+; CHECK:      exit.b:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   ret void
+
+exit.c:
+  ret void
+; Check that there isn't a split loop exit.
+; CHECK-NOT:    br label %exit.c
+;
+; CHECK:      exit.c:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   ret void
+}

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-SimpleSwitch.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-SimpleSwitch.ll?rev=306257&r1=306256&r2=306257&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-SimpleSwitch.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-SimpleSwitch.ll Sun Jun 25 15:45:31 2017
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-unswitch -disable-output -stats -info-output-file - < %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=STATS %s
 ; RUN: opt -S -loop-unswitch -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info < %s | FileCheck %s
 
-; STATS: 1 loop-simplify - Number of pre-header or exit blocks inserted
 ; STATS: 2 loop-unswitch - Number of switches unswitched
 
 ; CHECK:      %1 = icmp eq i32 %c, 1

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches-Threshold.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches-Threshold.ll?rev=306257&r1=306256&r2=306257&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches-Threshold.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches-Threshold.ll Sun Jun 25 15:45:31 2017
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-unswitch -loop-unswitch-threshold 13 -disable-output -stats -info-output-file - < %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=STATS %s
 ; RUN: opt -S -loop-unswitch -loop-unswitch-threshold 13 -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info < %s | FileCheck %s
 
-; STATS: 1 loop-simplify - Number of pre-header or exit blocks inserted
 ; STATS: 1 loop-unswitch - Number of switches unswitched
 
 ; ModuleID = '../llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches.ll'

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches.ll?rev=306257&r1=306256&r2=306257&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2011-11-18-TwoSwitches.ll Sun Jun 25 15:45:31 2017
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-unswitch -loop-unswitch-threshold 1000 -disable-output -stats -info-output-file - < %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=STATS %s
 ; RUN: opt -S -loop-unswitch -loop-unswitch-threshold 1000 -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info < %s | FileCheck %s
 
-; STATS: 1 loop-simplify - Number of pre-header or exit blocks inserted
 ; STATS: 3 loop-unswitch - Number of switches unswitched
 
 ; CHECK:        %1 = icmp eq i32 %c, 1




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list