[llvm] r305115 - [LVI] Fix spelling error in comment. NFC

[Craig Topper via llvm-commits]

Author: ctopper
Date: Fri Jun  9 16:21:17 2017
New Revision: 305115

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=305115&view=rev
Log:
[LVI] Fix spelling error in comment. NFC

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp?rev=305115&r1=305114&r2=305115&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp Fri Jun  9 16:21:17 2017
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ bool LazyValueInfoImpl::solveBlockValueI
   // that for all other pointer typed values, we terminate the search at the
   // definition.  We could easily extend this to look through geps, bitcasts,
   // and the like to prove non-nullness, but it's not clear that's worth it
-  // compile time wise.  The context-insensative value walk done inside
+  // compile time wise.  The context-insensitive value walk done inside
   // isKnownNonNull gets most of the profitable cases at much less expense.
   // This does mean that we have a sensativity to where the defining
   // instruction is placed, even if it could legally be hoisted much higher.