[PATCH] D30709: Handle IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB in RuntimeDyldCOFF
Saleem Abdulrasool via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jun 3 15:04:14 PDT 2017
compnerd requested changes to this revision.
compnerd added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
================
Comment at: lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/Targets/RuntimeDyldCOFFX86_64.h:36-43
+ uint64_t getImageBase() {
+ if (!ImageBase) {
+ ImageBase = std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max();
+ for (const SectionEntry &Section : Sections)
+ ImageBase = std::min(ImageBase, Section.getLoadAddress());
+ }
+ return ImageBase;
----------------
This seems wrong. We must have an `__ImageBase__` in COFF land. This would attempt to emulate that, resulting in the `IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB` becoming a `IMAGE_REL_AMD64_SECREL`.
Note that you want `Sections[0].getLoadAddress()` as an approximation of `__ImageBase__`.
================
Comment at: lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/Targets/RuntimeDyldCOFFX86_64.h:138
+
+ {
+ RelocationValueRef OriginalRelValueRef;
----------------
Why the extra scope?
================
Comment at: lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/Targets/RuntimeDyldCOFFX86_64.h:145
+
+ StubMap::const_iterator i = Stubs.find(OriginalRelValueRef);
+
----------------
Use `auto`. I think that you can fold this a bit:
if (const auto &S = Stubs.find(OriginalRelValueRef)) {
} else {
}
================
Comment at: lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/Targets/RuntimeDyldCOFFX86_64.h:156
+ Section.advanceStubOffset(getMaxStubSize());
+ }
+ else {
----------------
Remove the newline.
================
Comment at: lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/Targets/RuntimeDyldCOFFX86_64.h:288
+ // with an IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB relocation. Using a memory manager
+ // that keeps sections ordered in realtion to __ImageBase is necessary.
+ if (Name == ".pdata") {
----------------
Typo `relation` -> `relation`.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30709
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list