[llvm] r304402 - [DAGCombine] Refactor common addcarry pattern.

[Amaury Sechet via llvm-commits]

Author: deadalnix
Date: Thu Jun  1 05:48:04 2017
New Revision: 304402

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=304402&view=rev
Log:
[DAGCombine] Refactor common addcarry pattern.

Summary: This pattern is no very useful per se, but it exposes optimization for toehr patterns that wouldn't kick in otherwize. It's very common and worth optimizing for.

Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32756

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/addcarry.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp?rev=304402&r1=304401&r2=304402&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp Thu Jun  1 05:48:04 2017
@@ -2216,6 +2216,41 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitADDCARRYLike(S
     return DAG.getNode(ISD::ADDCARRY, SDLoc(N), N->getVTList(),
                        N0.getOperand(0), N0.getOperand(1), CarryIn);
 
+  /**
+   * When one of the addcarry argument is itself a carry, we may be facing
+   * a diamond carry propagation. In which case we try to transform the DAG
+   * to ensure linear carry propagation if that is possible.
+   *
+   * We are trying to get:
+   *   (addcarry X, 0, (addcarry A, B, Z):Carry)
+   */
+  if (auto Y = getAsCarry(TLI, N1)) {
+    /**
+     *            (uaddo A, B)
+     *             /       \
+     *          Carry      Sum
+     *            |          \
+     *            | (addcarry *, 0, Z)
+     *            |       /
+     *             \   Carry
+     *              |   /
+     * (addcarry X, *, *)
+     */
+    if (Y.getOpcode() == ISD::UADDO &&
+        CarryIn.getResNo() == 1 &&
+        CarryIn.getOpcode() == ISD::ADDCARRY &&
+        isNullConstant(CarryIn.getOperand(1)) &&
+        CarryIn.getOperand(0) == Y.getValue(0)) {
+      auto NewY = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADDCARRY, SDLoc(N), Y->getVTList(),
+                              Y.getOperand(0), Y.getOperand(1),
+                              CarryIn.getOperand(2));
+      AddToWorklist(NewY.getNode());
+      return DAG.getNode(ISD::ADDCARRY, SDLoc(N), N->getVTList(), N0,
+                         DAG.getConstant(0, SDLoc(N), N0.getValueType()),
+                         NewY.getValue(1));
+    }
+  }
+
   return SDValue();
 }
 

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/addcarry.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/addcarry.ll?rev=304402&r1=304401&r2=304402&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/addcarry.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/addcarry.ll Thu Jun  1 05:48:04 2017
@@ -86,21 +86,14 @@ entry:
 define %scalar @pr31719(%scalar* nocapture readonly %this, %scalar %arg.b) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: pr31719:
 ; CHECK:       # BB#0: # %entry
-; CHECK-NEXT:    xorl %r10d, %r10d
-; CHECK-NEXT:    addq 8(%rsi), %rcx
-; CHECK-NEXT:    setb %r10b
-; CHECK-NEXT:    xorl %eax, %eax
-; CHECK-NEXT:    addq 16(%rsi), %r8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    setb %al
-; CHECK-NEXT:    addq 24(%rsi), %r9
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    addq (%rsi), %rdx
-; CHECK-NEXT:    adcq $0, %rcx
-; CHECK-NEXT:    adcq %r8, %r10
-; CHECK-NEXT:    adcq %r9, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT:    adcq 8(%rsi), %rcx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    adcq 16(%rsi), %r8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    adcq 24(%rsi), %r9
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %rdx, (%rdi)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %rcx, 8(%rdi)
-; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %r10, 16(%rdi)
-; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %rax, 24(%rdi)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %r8, 16(%rdi)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %r9, 24(%rdi)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %rdi, %rax
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
 entry: