[PATCH] D21723: [RFC] Enhance synchscope representation

[Mehdi AMINI via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mehdi_amini added a comment.

To expand: my current concern is that the issue spotted with "instance" of scope makes the whole mechanism entirely opaque now, I'm not longer sure what is the point of specifying it at the IR level in a target-independent way.
@t-tye you were the one mentioning some generic understanding of the code as one of the original motivation IIRC?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723