[PATCH] D32881: Read public symbol names for LazyObjectFiles in parallel.
Davide Italiano via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 25 19:51:55 PDT 2017
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits
<llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Here is the table of your benchmark results. It seems they aren't different
> to me.
>
> --threads
>
> Index w/o Index
> 3.128589132 3.128069636 1.000
> 3.302902865 3.294943688 1.002
> 4.842033728 4.852418117 0.997
> 5.031806070 5.007721261 1.004
> 5.061450822 5.067567389 0.998
> 5.223625773 5.213661213 1.001
> 2.777111220 2.770632998 1.002
> 2.870435296 2.876185518 0.998
> 2.041417779 2.043296975 0.999
> 2.120939637 2.121668866 0.999
> 1.543028971 1.551262595 0.994
> 1.556195605 1.559701231 0.997
>
> --no-threads
>
> Index w/o Index
> 4.648823604 4.634666491 1.003
> 4.656633102 4.656090134 1.000
> 7.298663474 7.288234015 1.001
> 7.310040628 7.303389055 1.000
> 7.508681533 7.496336533 1.001
> 7.517153977 7.512991823 1.000
> 4.089264337 4.097596474 0.997
> 4.082382992 4.089621870 0.998
> 2.202735522 2.210372640 0.996
> 2.205530082 2.216226573 0.995
> 3.156375368 3.165926995 0.996
> 3.158119913 3.166431410 0.997
>
Honestly, the improvements/regressions seem just noise to me. If these
are numbers patched/unpatched, I'd say this patch is mostly
performance neutral.
--
Davide
"There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more
or less solved" -- Henri Poincare
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list