[polly] r303420 - [ScopDetection] Allow detection of full functions
Tobias Grosser via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 19 05:13:03 PDT 2017
Author: grosser
Date: Fri May 19 07:13:02 2017
New Revision: 303420
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=303420&view=rev
Log:
[ScopDetection] Allow detection of full functions
This is useful when only analyzing functions.
Added:
polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/full-function.ll
Modified:
polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp
Modified: polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp?rev=303420&r1=303419&r2=303420&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp (original)
+++ polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp Fri May 19 07:13:02 2017
@@ -96,6 +96,11 @@ static cl::opt<std::string> OnlyFunction
cl::value_desc("string"), cl::ValueRequired, cl::init(""),
cl::cat(PollyCategory));
+static cl::opt<bool>
+ AllowFullFunction("polly-detect-full-functions",
+ cl::desc("Allow the detection of full functions"),
+ cl::init(false), cl::cat(PollyCategory));
+
static cl::opt<std::string> OnlyRegion(
"polly-only-region",
cl::desc("Only run on certain regions (The provided identifier must "
@@ -1502,8 +1507,9 @@ bool ScopDetection::isValidRegion(Detect
// SCoP cannot contain the entry block of the function, because we need
// to insert alloca instruction there when translate scalar to array.
- if (CurRegion.getEntry() ==
- &(CurRegion.getEntry()->getParent()->getEntryBlock()))
+ if (!AllowFullFunction &&
+ CurRegion.getEntry() ==
+ &(CurRegion.getEntry()->getParent()->getEntryBlock()))
return invalid<ReportEntry>(Context, /*Assert=*/true, CurRegion.getEntry());
if (!allBlocksValid(Context))
Added: polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/full-function.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/full-function.ll?rev=303420&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/full-function.ll (added)
+++ polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/full-function.ll Fri May 19 07:13:02 2017
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-scops -analyze -polly-detect-full-functions < %s \
+; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=FULL
+; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-scops -analyze < %s \
+; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=WITHOUT-FULL
+
+; FULL: Statements {
+; FULL-NEXT: Stmt_loop_1
+; FULL-NEXT: Domain :=
+; FULL-NEXT: [p] -> { Stmt_loop_1[i0] : p = 42 and 0 <= i0 <= 1025 };
+; FULL-NEXT: Schedule :=
+; FULL-NEXT: [p] -> { Stmt_loop_1[i0] -> [1, i0] };
+; FULL-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
+; FULL-NEXT: [p] -> { Stmt_loop_1[i0] -> MemRef_A[0] };
+; FULL-NEXT: Stmt_loop_2
+; FULL-NEXT: Domain :=
+; FULL-NEXT: [p] -> { Stmt_loop_2[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 1025 and (p >= 43 or p <= 41) };
+; FULL-NEXT: Schedule :=
+; FULL-NEXT: [p] -> { Stmt_loop_2[i0] -> [0, i0] : p >= 43 or p <= 41 };
+; FULL-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
+; FULL-NEXT: [p] -> { Stmt_loop_2[i0] -> MemRef_A[0] };
+; FULL-NEXT: }
+
+; WITHOUT-FULL: Statements {
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: Stmt_loop_2
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: Domain :=
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: { Stmt_loop_2[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 1025 };
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: Schedule :=
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: { Stmt_loop_2[i0] -> [i0] };
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: { Stmt_loop_2[i0] -> MemRef_A[0] };
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: }
+
+; WITHOUT-FULL: Statements {
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: Stmt_loop_1
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: Domain :=
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: { Stmt_loop_1[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 1025 };
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: Schedule :=
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: { Stmt_loop_1[i0] -> [i0] };
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: { Stmt_loop_1[i0] -> MemRef_A[0] };
+; WITHOUT-FULL-NEXT: }
+
+define void @foo(float* %A, i32 %p) {
+bb:
+ %cmp = icmp eq i32 %p, 42
+ br i1 %cmp, label %loop.1, label %loop.2
+
+loop.1:
+ %indvar.1 = phi i64 [0, %bb], [%indvar.next.1, %loop.1]
+ %indvar.next.1 = add i64 %indvar.1, 1
+ store float 42.0, float* %A
+ %cmp.1 = icmp sle i64 %indvar.1, 1024
+ br i1 %cmp.1, label %loop.1, label %merge
+
+loop.2:
+ %indvar.2 = phi i64 [0, %bb], [%indvar.next.2, %loop.2]
+ %indvar.next.2 = add i64 %indvar.2, 1
+ store float 42.0, float* %A
+ %cmp.2 = icmp sle i64 %indvar.2, 1024
+ br i1 %cmp.2, label %loop.2, label %merge
+
+merge:
+ ret void
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list