[PATCH] D33228: [SCEV] Always sort AddRecExprs from different loops by dominance
Max Kazantsev via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 15 23:45:37 PDT 2017
mkazantsev created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: mzolotukhin.
Sorting of AddRecExprs by loop nesting does not make sense since we only invoke the CompareSCEVComplexity for AddRecExprs that are used by one SCEV. This guarantees that there is always a dominance relationship between them. This patch removes the sorting by nesting which is a dead code in current usage of this function.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33228
Files:
lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
Index: lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -629,19 +629,18 @@
const SCEVAddRecExpr *LA = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LHS);
const SCEVAddRecExpr *RA = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(RHS);
- // If there is a dominance relationship between the loops, sort by the
- // dominance. Otherwise, sort by depth.
+ // There is always a dominance between two recs that are used by one
+ // SCEV, so we can safely sort recs by loop header dominance.
const Loop *LLoop = LA->getLoop(), *RLoop = RA->getLoop();
if (LLoop != RLoop) {
const BasicBlock *LHead = LLoop->getHeader(), *RHead = RLoop->getHeader();
assert(LHead != RHead && "Two loops share the same header?");
if (DT.dominates(LHead, RHead))
return 1;
- else if (DT.dominates(RHead, LHead))
- return -1;
- unsigned LDepth = LLoop->getLoopDepth(), RDepth = RLoop->getLoopDepth();
- if (LDepth != RDepth)
- return (int)LDepth - (int)RDepth;
+ else
+ assert(DT.dominates(RHead, LHead) &&
+ "No dominance between recurrencies used by one SCEV?");
+ return -1;
}
// Addrec complexity grows with operand count.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D33228.99104.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1311 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170516/a7d8bbb9/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list