[PATCH] D32996: [IfConversion] Add missing check in IfConversion/canFallThroughTo

Mikael Holmén via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 10 06:19:34 PDT 2017


This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL302650: [IfConversion] Add missing check in IfConversion/canFallThroughTo (authored by uabelho).

Changed prior to commit:
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D32996?vs=98417&id=98438#toc

Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D32996

Files:
  llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp
  llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/MIR/ARM/ifcvt_canFallThroughTo.mir


Index: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp
@@ -1318,7 +1318,8 @@
       return false;
     PI = I++;
   }
-  return true;
+  // Finally see if the last I is indeed a successor to PI.
+  return PI->isSuccessor(&*I);
 }
 
 /// Invalidate predecessor BB info so it would be re-analyzed to determine if it
Index: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/MIR/ARM/ifcvt_canFallThroughTo.mir
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/MIR/ARM/ifcvt_canFallThroughTo.mir
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/MIR/ARM/ifcvt_canFallThroughTo.mir
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# RUN: llc -mtriple=arm-apple-ios -o - %s -run-pass if-converter | FileCheck %s
+---
+name:            f1
+body:             |
+  bb.0:
+    successors: %bb.1
+
+    B %bb.1
+
+  bb.1:
+    successors: %bb.2, %bb.4
+
+    Bcc %bb.4, 1, %cpsr
+
+  bb.2:
+    successors: %bb.3, %bb.5
+
+    Bcc %bb.5, 1, %cpsr
+
+  bb.3:
+    successors: %bb.5
+
+    B %bb.5
+
+  bb.4:
+    successors:
+
+  bb.5:
+    successors: %bb.1, %bb.6
+
+    Bcc %bb.1, 1, %cpsr
+
+  bb.6:
+    BX_RET 14, _
+
+...
+
+# IfConversion.cpp/canFallThroughTo thought there was a fallthrough from
+# bb.4 to bb5 even if the successor list was empty.
+# bb.4 is empty, so it surely looks like it can fallthrough, but this is what
+# happens for a bb just containing an "unreachable".
+
+#CHECK: body:             |
+#CHECK:   bb.0:
+#CHECK:     successors: %bb.1
+
+#CHECK:   bb.1:
+#CHECK:     successors: %bb.3({{.*}}), %bb.2
+
+# The original brr_cond from bb.1, jumping to the empty bb
+#CHECK:     Bcc %bb.2
+#CHECK:     B %bb.3
+
+# Empty bb.2, originally containing "unreachable" and thus has no successors
+#CHECK:   bb.2:
+#CHECK-NOT: successors
+
+#CHECK:   bb.3:
+#CHECK:     successors: %bb.1
+
+# Conditional BX_RET and then loop back to bb.1
+#CHECK:     BX_RET 0
+#CHECK:     B %bb.1
+


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D32996.98438.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2010 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170510/d6c55193/attachment.bin>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list