[PATCH] D32839: SimplifyLibCalls: Optimize wcslen
Matthias Braun via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 8 14:08:53 PDT 2017
MatzeB added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.cpp:1420
+ M.getModuleFlag("wchar_size")))
+ return cast<ConstantInt>(ShortWChar->getValue())->getZExtValue();
+ return getTargetWCharSize(Triple(M.getTargetTriple()));
----------------
efriedma wrote:
> We should probably have a verifier check to make sure these casts will succeed.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32974
================
Comment at: lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp:458
+ I < E; ++I) {
+ if (Index.Array->getElementAsInteger(I) == 0) {
+ NullTermIdx = I;
----------------
efriedma wrote:
> MatzeB wrote:
> > efriedma wrote:
> > > Could you use an iterator which returns the elements of the ConstantDataArray, instead of using explicit indexing everywhere?
> > There are no iterators defined for ConstantDataArray, did I miss something? (Defining them seems tricky to get right to support various datatypes and target/host data conversions).
> No, there aren't any existing iterators.
>
> It doesn't seem that tricky to write, though. It could just be a wrapper around getElementAsInteger; or if you want to get fancy, you could represent it as a pointer+width pair, I guess. (The data is just an array of integers in host byte order.)
I tried this and it looks like this: https://reviews.llvm.org/P7994
39 extra lines added for the iterator foo and none of the actual uses gets simpler.
(If you now want to argue that I didn't use llvm::enumerate(), then I'd kindly ask you to present me an example of how the heck I can implement an interator compliant the forward iterator concept where operator* returns a reference! to the underlying object).
I worked on this stuff for >2 hours now and it is definitely "tricky to write" and not really necessary here.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32839
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list