[PATCH] D30107: Make DynamicLibrary::getPermanentLibrary have a defined ordering.

[Frederich Munch via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

marsupial updated this revision to Diff 96343.
marsupial added a comment.

Ming seems to have EnumProcessModules which will also work on Win32, so only use EnumProcessModulesEx on Win64 (where EnumProcessModules will fail!).

Could someone who uses ming32 test if this is working?
If no one steps up, what is the etiquette for using the bots to test?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D30107

Files:
  include/llvm/Support/DynamicLibrary.h
  lib/Support/CMakeLists.txt
  lib/Support/DynamicLibrary.cpp
  lib/Support/SearchForAddressOfSpecialSymbol.cpp
  lib/Support/Unix/DynamicLibrary.inc
  lib/Support/Windows/DynamicLibrary.inc
  unittests/Support/CMakeLists.txt
  unittests/Support/DynamicLibrary/CMakeLists.txt
  unittests/Support/DynamicLibrary/DynamicLibraryTest.cpp
  unittests/Support/DynamicLibrary/PipSqueak.cxx
  unittests/Support/DynamicLibrary/PipSqueak.h

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D30107.96343.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 34366 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170424/6a01ac5e/attachment.bin>