[PATCH] D31598: [SCEV] Try to get RHS from sext in implication via operations
Sanjoy Das via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 3 11:28:35 PDT 2017
sanjoy added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31598#716967, @mkazantsev wrote:
> Well, this situation is not something that can be reached easily (mostly because normal add does not propagate nsw flag), but I will try.
One way is to change it to an assert and then try to bootstrap clang[1], and see what breaks. :)
[1]: http://llvm.org/docs/AdvancedBuilds.html#id2
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31598
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list