[PATCH] D30941: Better testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs

[Hal Finkel via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

hfinkel added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30941#703612, @avt77 wrote:

> hfinkel, yes I mean I'll do it in the next version of this patch soon.
>  rksimon, do you mean we should rename the compiler option like "-print-schedule"?


It is not clear to me why you won't just always do this when in verbose-asm mode. Thoughts on not having a separate option at all?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D30941